[linux-lvm] When and why vgs command can change metadata and incur old metadata to be backed up?
teigland at redhat.com
Mon Oct 30 18:50:00 UTC 2017
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:11:16PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> > that in theory are only reading and reporting information. I've also
> > suggested that whenever repairs are done, lvm should record a persistent
> > message in the system log with the details, but that idea didn't get a
> > great reception.
> Just to know: why the idea of syslog reporting was discarded?
It was so obviously correct to me that I had a hard time arguing for it.
I don't think any of the objections were satisfactory, e.g. nobody has
asked, nobody needs it, the metadata archives are good enough, you can
already configure log messages to go to syslog.
I am still hoping to do something like this either as a part of
centralizing metadata repair (in progress), or as a part of a broader
suggestion that did get a better response but will take more work. That
was to create a new log file and format in which every lvm disk change is
Everyone is encouraged to give their feedback about that in that bz, or
create an "issue" on the lvm github.
More information about the linux-lvm