[linux-lvm] lvm.conf backup section

[Far Had]

Thanks for the response,
but I still don't get the point. Assume that I use same names for my VGs,
In this case if I do for example:
*retain_days = 10*
and
*retain_min = 15*
in lvm.conf file, what is the system's behaviour when archiving backup
files? Please explain specifically.

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:35 PM Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac at redhat.com> wrote:

> Dne 28. 11. 18 v 10:51 Far Had napsal(a):
> > Hi
> > There are two parameters in lvm.conf which I don't understand the exact
> > meaning of.
> >
> > 1. retain_min
> > 2. retain_days
> >
> > What do "*the minimum number of archive files you wish to keep*" and
> "*minimum
> > time you wish to keep an archive file for*" mean?
> > Is there any auto deletion mechanism for backup archives?
>
> Hi
>
>
> There is kept history for 'created' VGs, where you can specify how many
> and for how long archives for individual VG you want to store.
>
> This works reasonably well if you use 'same VG names' all the time.
>
> However - when you use lvm2 on some testing machine where the VG name is
> essentially some random hash md5 lengthy string - you will sooner or later
> end
> with gazillion archive files in your /etc/lvm/archive directory.
>
> In this case it's admins responsibility to prune VG archive files that are
> no
> longer necessary.
>
> lvm2 has no idea if the VG named like: "myvg01320982woicdo8uagcd97wghcd"
> will be still ever needed again - so such archives are kept mostly
> forever....
>
> Every command you run which modifies metadata of particular VG does care
> only
> about that particular VG and it's archives.
>
> Hopefully this explains it.
>
> Regards
>
> Zdenek
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/attachments/20181128/5a6c8cee/attachment.htm>