[linux-lvm] pvresize will cause a meta-data corruption with error message "Error writing device at 4096 length 512"
Heming Zhao
heming.zhao at suse.com
Sat Oct 12 06:34:33 UTC 2019
Hello David,
Thank you for your reply.
For these days analysis code, I found below codes can be enhanced.
(code changes base on git master branch.)
---------------
commit 3768196011fb01e4016510bfab9eef0c7bdc04f5 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao at suse.com>
Date: Sat Oct 12 14:28:06 2019 +0800
fix typo in lib/cache/lvmcache.c
enhance error handling in bcache
fix constant var 'error' in _scan_list
fix gcc warning in _lvconvert_split_cache_single
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao at suse.com>
diff --git a/lib/cache/lvmcache.c b/lib/cache/lvmcache.c
index f6e792459b..499f9437cb 100644
--- a/lib/cache/lvmcache.c
+++ b/lib/cache/lvmcache.c
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ int lvmcache_label_rescan_vg_rw(struct cmd_context *cmd, const char *vgname, con
* incorrectly placed PVs should have been moved from the orphan vginfo
* onto their correct vginfo's, and the orphan vginfo should (in theory)
* represent only real orphan PVs. (Note: if lvmcache_label_scan is run
- * after vg_read udpates to lvmcache state, then the lvmcache will be
+ * after vg_read updates to lvmcache state, then the lvmcache will be
* incorrect again, so do not run lvmcache_label_scan during the
* processing phase.)
*
diff --git a/lib/device/bcache.c b/lib/device/bcache.c
index d100419770..cfe01bac2f 100644
--- a/lib/device/bcache.c
+++ b/lib/device/bcache.c
@@ -292,6 +292,10 @@ static bool _async_issue(struct io_engine *ioe, enum dir d, int fd,
} while (r == -EAGAIN);
if (r < 0) {
+ ((struct block *)context)->error = r;
+ log_warn("io_submit <%c> off %llu bytes %llu return %d:%s",
+ (d == DIR_READ) ? 'R' : 'W', (long long unsigned)offset,
+ (long long unsigned)nbytes, r, strerror(-r));
_cb_free(e->cbs, cb);
return false;
}
@@ -842,7 +846,7 @@ static void _complete_io(void *context, int err)
if (b->error) {
dm_list_add(&cache->errored, &b->list);
-
+ log_warn("fd: %d error: %d", b->fd, err);
} else {
_clear_flags(b, BF_DIRTY);
_link_block(b);
@@ -869,8 +873,7 @@ static void _issue_low_level(struct block *b, enum dir d)
dm_list_move(&cache->io_pending, &b->list);
if (!cache->engine->issue(cache->engine, d, b->fd, sb, se, b->data, b)) {
- /* FIXME: if io_submit() set an errno, return that instead of EIO? */
- _complete_io(b, -EIO);
+ _complete_io(b, b->error);
return;
}
}
diff --git a/lib/label/label.c b/lib/label/label.c
index dc4d32d151..60ad387219 100644
--- a/lib/label/label.c
+++ b/lib/label/label.c
@@ -647,7 +647,6 @@ static int _scan_list(struct cmd_context *cmd, struct dev_filter *f,
int submit_count;
int scan_failed;
int is_lvm_device;
- int error;
int ret;
dm_list_init(&wait_devs);
@@ -694,12 +693,12 @@ static int _scan_list(struct cmd_context *cmd, struct dev_filter *f,
dm_list_iterate_items_safe(devl, devl2, &wait_devs) {
bb = NULL;
- error = 0;
scan_failed = 0;
is_lvm_device = 0;
if (!bcache_get(scan_bcache, devl->dev->bcache_fd, 0, 0, &bb)) {
- log_debug_devs("Scan failed to read %s error %d.", dev_name(devl->dev), error);
+ log_debug_devs("Scan failed to read %s error %d.",
+ dev_name(devl->dev), bb ? bb->error : 0);
scan_failed = 1;
scan_read_errors++;
scan_failed_count++;
diff --git a/tools/lvconvert.c b/tools/lvconvert.c
index 60ab956614..4939e5ec7d 100644
--- a/tools/lvconvert.c
+++ b/tools/lvconvert.c
@@ -4676,7 +4676,7 @@ static int _lvconvert_split_cache_single(struct cmd_context *cmd,
struct logical_volume *lv_main = NULL;
struct logical_volume *lv_fast = NULL;
struct lv_segment *seg;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
if (lv_is_writecache(lv)) {
lv_main = lv;
---
Thanks
zhm
On 10/11/19 11:14 PM, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:11:29AM +0000, Heming Zhao wrote:
>
>> I analyze this issue for some days. It looks a new bug.
>
> Yes, thanks for the thorough analysis.
>
>> In user machine, this write action was failed, the PV header data (first
>> 4K) save in bcache (cache->errored list), and then write (by
>> bcache_flush) to another disk (f748).
>
> It looks like we need to get rid of cache->errored completely.
>
>> If dev_write_bytes failed, the bcache never clean last_byte. and the fd
>> is closed at same time, but cache->errored still have errored fd's data.
>> later lvm open new disk, the fd may reuse the old-errored fd number,
>> error data will be written when later lvm call bcache_flush.
>
> That's a bad bug.
>
>> 2> duplicated pv header.
>> as <1> description, fc68 metadata was overwritten to f748.
>> this cause by lvm bug (I said in <1>).
>>
>> 3> device not correct
>> I don't know why the disk scsi-360060e80072a670000302a670000fc68 has below wrong metadata:
>>
>> pre_pvr/scsi-360060e80072a670000302a670000fc68
>> (please also read the comments in below metadata area.)
>> ```
>> vgpocdbcdb1_r2 {
>> id = "PWd17E-xxx-oANHbq"
>> seqno = 20
>> format = "lvm2"
>> status = ["RESIZEABLE", "READ", "WRITE"]
>> flags = []
>> extent_size = 65536
>> max_lv = 0
>> max_pv = 0
>> metadata_copies = 0
>>
>> physical_volumes {
>>
>> pv0 {
>> id = "3KTOW5-xxxx-8g0Rf2"
>> device = "/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-360060e80072a660000302a660000f768"
>> Wrong!! ^^^^^
>> I don't know why there is f768, please ask customer
>> status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
>> flags = []
>> dev_size = 860160
>> pe_start = 2048
>> pe_count = 13
>> }
>> }
>> ```
>> fc68 => f768 the 'c' (b1100) change to '7' (b0111).
>> maybe disk bit overturn, maybe lvm has bug. I don't know & have no idea.
>
> Is scsi-360060e80072a660000302a660000f768 the correct device for
> PVID 3KTOW5...? If so, then it's consistent. If not, then I suspect
> this is a result of duplicating the PVID on multiple devices above.
>
>
>> On 9/11/19 5:17 PM, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>> Our user encountered a meta-data corruption problem, when run pvresize command after upgrading to LVM2 v2.02.180 from v2.02.120.
>>>
>>> The details are as below,
>>> we have following environment:
>>> - Storage: HP XP7 (SAN) - LUN's are presented to ESX via RDM
>>> - VMWare ESXi 6.5
>>> - SLES 12 SP 4 Guest
>>>
>>> Resize happened this way (is our standard way since years) - however - this is our first resize after upgrading SLES 12 SP3 to SLES 12 SP4 - until this upgrade, we
>>> never had a problem like this:
>>> - split continous access on storage box, resize lun on XP7
>>> - recreate ca on XP7
>>> - scan on ESX
>>> - rescan-scsi-bus.sh -s on SLES VM
>>> - pvresize ( at this step the error happened)
>>>
>>> huns1vdb01:~ # pvresize /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-360060e80072a660000302a6600003274
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-lvm mailing list
>> linux-lvm at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list