[linux-lvm] discussion about activation/auto_activation_volume_list

heming.zhao at suse.com heming.zhao at suse.com
Thu Nov 19 06:46:15 UTC 2020

On 11/19/20 2:23 AM, David Teigland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:28:21AM +0800, Gang He wrote:
>> I prefer to use a metadata flag for each VG or LV to skip auto-activation.
>> Otherwise, it is not easy for the pacemaker cluster to manager a local
>> VG(e.g. local or systemid type) in a cluster via active-passive mode.
> I created a bug for this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899214

Hello Dave

I read the bug ticket and verified the "lvchange -k", it works.
If I understand correctly, the "lvchange -k" is enough for current issue. 
And you previous mails wanted to have a new function/flag for unify management vg & lv, am I right?

More information about the linux-lvm mailing list