[linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync

[Demi Marie Obenour]

Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe?
In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these,
but only for operations performed by qubesd.  systemd-udevd will still
be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices
these commands create or destroy.  systemd-udevd will still be in charge
of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use
neither of these.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/attachments/20220401/3152bb85/attachment.sig>