[linux-lvm] LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
Gionatan Danti
g.danti at assyoma.it
Mon Jan 31 07:52:39 UTC 2022
Il 2022-01-30 22:17 Demi Marie Obenour ha scritto:
> On Xen, the paravirtualised block backend driver (blkback) requires a
> block device, so file-based virtual disks are implemented with a loop
> device managed by the toolstack. Suggestions for improving this
> less-than-satisfactory situation are welcome.
Ah - I expected that with something as
disk = [ 'file:mydisk.img,hda,w' ]
Xen would have directly used "mydisk.img" as the backend disk file. Does
it instead automatically create a loopback overlay?
I mainly use KVM, and maybe I am spoiled by its capability to use
basically any datastore as backing disk.
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list