From cibu at google.com Tue Oct 1 21:57:40 2013 From: cibu at google.com (=?UTF-8?B?Q2lidSBKb2hueSAo4LS44LS/4LSs4LWBKQ==?=) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:57:40 -0700 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Need information regarding Samvruthokaram ligature in Malayalam fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I totally agree with Shriramana. I just want to reiterate that this is an invented glyph and there is no public consensus on this. In fact, public is not even aware of this. Probably because, they don't notice the small circle attached to the Chandrakkala at small point sizes or they may not be using Lohit. also, this Samvruthokaram sequence (-u sign + virama) is used only for traditional spelling and most users go with modern spelling for those words. 2013/9/30 Shriramana Sharma > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Rahul Bhalerao > wrote: > > The original issue was as follows: > > - The 'samvruthokaram' syllable in malayalam is actually a half vowel > which > > is formed by vowel 'U' (Unicode 0D41) followed by the halanth character > in > > malayalam. > > - Since halanth is by default allowed only after a consonant, the > sequence > > for samvruthokaram was yielding a dotted circle in between > > - Hence it was necessary to amend the rendering engine to allow this > > sequence > > Yeah but there is no justification for inventing a new ligature. > Inventing new written forms as part of script should not be done by > font makers/maintainers. The user community as per guidance of > scholars should invent these and if officially/widely accepted then > font makers should update their font > > > There is a long discussion on this and few other issues on the old bug > at: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242016 > > I don't seem to find any detail there on this particular issue. > > > As far the shape of the glyph in Lohit font is concerned, once the > rendering > > engine issue of dotted circle was resolved, the shape of the ligature for > > samvruthokaram was changed on the request of Ani Peter. I am not able to > > find the old bug in bugzilla but remember that the particular ligature > was > > added on request from Ani. May be Ani can give some linguistic > justification > > for the particular shape which I am not aware of. > > If there is any attestation for the use and acceptance of this > ligature in the script as seen in books/newspapers etc, I'd like to > see that. I feel Lohit is NOT the platform for glyph inventions... > > -- > Shriramana Sharma ???????????? ???????????? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From psatpute at redhat.com Thu Oct 3 05:16:56 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:46:56 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Announcing Alpha release 2.91.0 of lohit-devanagari from lohit2 project Message-ID: <524CFDC8.1070109@redhat.com> Hi All, It took more time than i thought initial but happy that now we are clear with most of the things (feature file, AGL guidelines). Completely rewritten Open type tables lohit-devanagari is now available. Silent feature of this. 1. Supporting dev2 and deva both. 2. Following AGL 3. Feature file (Open type table) is separate than .sfd file. (Though i have kept Open type tables in .sfd file as well but while building ttf we import rules from .fea file) 4. Tested with Harfbuzz and Windows8 Uniscribe version (Will test with other older platform before Beta release) 5. test-devanagari.txt is available (Dunno should we provide .pdf may be) Updated lohit project page [1] with the download links and other information This is alpha release so need contribution for testing this. I will soon build this for Fedora 20 and request some people using Devanagari script regular to install this version. I will recommend to report bugs on github [2], Fedora specifics bug can go to Fedora bugzilla [3] Thanks for people supporting and contributing in this. Best Regards, Pravin Satpute 1. https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ 2. https://github.com/pravins/lohit/issues 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&component=lohit-assamese-fonts&component=lohit-bengali-fonts&component=lohit-devanagari-fonts&component=lohit-gujarati-fonts&component=lohit-kannada-fonts&component=lohit-malayalam-fonts&component=lohit-oriya-fonts&component=lohit-punjabi-fonts&component=lohit-tamil-fonts&component=lohit-telugu-fonts&product=Fedora&classification=Fedora From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 3 06:44:28 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:44:28 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 981475] Improper glyph names in Lohit fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute --- With the Lohit2 project we are redoing all stuff. Just done release of Lohit-Devanagari 2.91.0, it fixes this issue. https://www.redhat.com/archives/lohit-devel-list/2013-October/msg00001.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lFIyzNXWIO&a=cc_unsubscribe From kartik.mistry at gmail.com Sat Oct 5 05:04:30 2013 From: kartik.mistry at gmail.com (Kartik Mistry) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 10:34:30 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Git tag Lohit fonts? Message-ID: Hi Devs, Currently, I can see following tags on upstream repository: lohit-2.5.1 lohit-2_0_13 lohit_1_0 Should we do tag with each release? Or better, if each language has different release timeline, move to separate repository for each language? -- Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_ {0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com From pravin.d.s at gmail.com Mon Oct 7 03:57:29 2013 From: pravin.d.s at gmail.com (pravin.d.s at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:27:29 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Git tag Lohit fonts? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 5 October 2013 10:34, Kartik Mistry wrote: > > Should we do tag with each release? Or better, if each language has > different release timeline, move to separate repository for each > language? > Hi Kartik, Good point. I think having tag with release will good enough, don't want to move each language to different repository for ease of maintenance. Present lohit git is already bit complicated and it will remain till we dont with lohit2 project. - Lohit 2 development activity going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2, After release we are merging it with main lohit branch. - Lohit present instance available on github as well on fedorahosted. We will update this in coming 6-7 months. For lohit project release tarballs are available from https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/ Thanks, Pravin Satpute -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From psatpute at redhat.com Mon Oct 7 15:35:16 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:05:16 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Announcing release of lohit-malayalam-2.5.4 (Resolves Samvruthokaram bug) Message-ID: <5252D4B4.4020005@redhat.com> Hi All, Though this is minor release but important from the perspective of compliance with script behaviours. Following are the improvement over the earlier release. - Corrected width of U+0D74 character - Removed deva tag from sfd - Removed 0x79-0x7e, 0x80,0x84, 0x85, 0x88 glyphs #1013269 - Deleted wrong glyph of Samvruthokaram #1013183 Fedorahosted page updated with links to download lohit-malayalam-fonts [1]. Regards, Pravin Satpute 1. https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ From psatpute at redhat.com Tue Oct 8 08:19:22 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:49:22 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2 :- further developments Message-ID: <5253C00A.5070409@redhat.com> Hi All, We have already achieved one of the milestone by doing the alpha release of Lohit Devanagari 2.91.0. What next? Further plan is as follows 1. Lohit Gujarati : - We already have bug open [1] regarding improper glyph naming of lohit-gujarati. Secondly as Gujarati is more nearer to Devanagari it will be bit easy to do work on. I will send detailed email regarding improvement we are planning in Lohit Gujarati. 2. Lohit Kannada: - This one is need improvement. There are some bug open already. [2][3] I will send another email for each of this with possible improvement with request for suggestions. Regards, Pravin Satpute 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905928 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 From psatpute at redhat.com Tue Oct 8 08:41:26 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:11:26 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Rewriting Lohit-Gujarati open type tables, plans for improvement !! Message-ID: <5253C536.7010209@redhat.com> Hi All, As written in previous email following are the improvements we can do in lohit-gujarati 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari 3. There are some cons_halant ligatures introduced (0x0139 to 0x15a), i am sure those got added due to some bugs w.r.t pango etc. So we can get rid of it. 4. Supporting "gujr" and "guj2" Opent type tag 5. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) This is presently what we are thinking, if anyone has more suggestions with this do reply. Thanks & Regards, Pravin Satpute From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 8 08:49:15 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:49:15 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 1013183] [ml_IN] Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oDMPcqsZQm&a=cc_unsubscribe From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 8 08:49:36 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:49:36 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 1013183] [ml_IN] Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EWmGLeZc6u&a=cc_unsubscribe From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 8 08:53:09 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:53:09 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 1013183] [ml_IN] Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u7YyC9lUbS&a=cc_unsubscribe From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 9 14:29:03 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:29:03 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 1013183] [ml_IN] Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- Package lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18548/lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fqdcDgYgaj&a=cc_unsubscribe From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 23 03:28:33 2013 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 03:28:33 +0000 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] [Bug 1013183] [ml_IN] Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4 | |-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-10-22 23:28:33 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.5.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UhTwNenpeH&a=cc_unsubscribe From psatpute at redhat.com Wed Oct 23 11:26:39 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:56:39 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! Message-ID: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> Hi All, First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, planning for Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the next week. Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other script fonts like 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) There are some more things needs attention 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by Shriramana [a] 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit Kannada carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be good if we can get rid of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me to fix this. These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need attention please let me know. On the top of this need lots of help from you all for testing activity. Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 repo. Once get ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. Best Regards, Pravin Satpute a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 From pavanaja at vishvakannada.com Wed Oct 23 11:48:29 2013 From: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com (Pavanaja U B) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:18:29 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! In-Reply-To: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> References: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> Message-ID: <001c01cecfe5$ce1b9e60$6a52db20$@vishvakannada.com> Rendering on Win XP will be different from Win7 and later versions in some special cases. The Unicode PR-37 was not implemented in the rendering engine of Win XP. It was implemented on Win 7 (or was it Vista? Anyhow, nobody is using Vista as such :-) ) and later. This is my understanding. Regards, Pavanaja -----Original Message----- From: Pravin Satpute [mailto:psatpute at redhat.com] Sent: 23 October 2013 16:57 To: lohit-devel-list at redhat.com Cc: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com; hallimanearavind at gmail.com; omshivaprakash at gmail.com; skore at redhat.com; svenkate at redhat.com; samjnaa at gmail.com; i18n at lists.fedoraproject.org; indlinux-group at lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! Hi All, First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, planning for Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the next week. Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other script fonts like 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) There are some more things needs attention 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by Shriramana [a] 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit Kannada carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be good if we can get rid of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me to fix this. These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need attention please let me know. On the top of this need lots of help from you all for testing activity. Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 repo. Once get ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. Best Regards, Pravin Satpute a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 From psatpute at redhat.com Wed Oct 23 11:54:59 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:24:59 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! In-Reply-To: <001c01cecfe5$ce1b9e60$6a52db20$@vishvakannada.com> References: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> <001c01cecfe5$ce1b9e60$6a52db20$@vishvakannada.com> Message-ID: <5267B913.9030800@redhat.com> On ?????? 23 ??????? 2013 05:18 ?.??., Pavanaja U B wrote: > Rendering on Win XP will be different from Win7 and later versions in some > special cases. The Unicode PR-37 was not implemented in the rendering engine > of Win XP. It was implemented on Win 7 (or was it Vista? Anyhow, nobody is > using Vista as such :-) ) and later. This is my understanding. Yes, do agree. Supporting both knda and knd2 is challenging. But we have to try for it since Lohit fonts are used as a Web fonts as well and it should render correctly on most of the platform. I think by Alpha release we will have better picture. Regards, Pravin Satpute > Regards, > Pavanaja > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pravin Satpute [mailto:psatpute at redhat.com] > Sent: 23 October 2013 16:57 > To: lohit-devel-list at redhat.com > Cc: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com; hallimanearavind at gmail.com; > omshivaprakash at gmail.com; skore at redhat.com; svenkate at redhat.com; > samjnaa at gmail.com; i18n at lists.fedoraproject.org; > indlinux-group at lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! > > Hi All, > > First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, planning for > Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the next week. > > Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other script > fonts like > > 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati > 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari > 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag > 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with Windows > XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) > > There are some more things needs attention > > 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by > Shriramana [a] > 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] > > From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit Kannada > carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be good if we can get rid > of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me to fix this. > > These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need attention > please let me know. On the top of this need lots of help from you all for > testing activity. > > Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 repo. Once get > ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. > > > Best Regards, > Pravin Satpute > > a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 > b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 > c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 > > > From skore at redhat.com Wed Oct 23 12:00:21 2013 From: skore at redhat.com (Sneha Kore) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:00:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! In-Reply-To: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> References: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1474916485.6921704.1382529621103.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> hello, As already specified in the original mail , Lohit kannada needs some improvements , I would like to mention that I have already gone through the task of GSUB cleanup & started to work for Glyph naming task. Regards, Sneha Kore ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Pravin Satpute" >To: lohit-devel-list at redhat.com >Cc: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com, hallimanearavind at gmail.com, omshivaprakash at gmail.com, skore at redhat.com, svenkate at redhat.com, samjnaa at gmail.com, i18n at lists.fedoraproject.org, indlinux-group at lists.sourceforge.net >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:56:39 PM >Subject: Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! > >Hi All, > > First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, planning >for Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the next >week. > > Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other >script fonts like > > 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati > 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari > 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag > 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with >Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) > > There are some more things needs attention > > 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by >Shriramana [a] > 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] > > From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit >Kannada carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be good if we >can get rid of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me to fix >this. > > These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need >attention please let me know. On the top of this need lots of help from >you all for testing activity. > > Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 repo. Once >get ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. > > >Best Regards, >Pravin Satpute > >a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 >b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 >c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 > From hallimanearavind at gmail.com Thu Oct 24 02:38:33 2013 From: hallimanearavind at gmail.com (Aravinda VK) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:08:33 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! In-Reply-To: <1474916485.6921704.1382529621103.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> <1474916485.6921704.1382529621103.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: Hi, As per my observations only blwf and akhn has difference between knda and knda2. Following table shows the difference knda knd2 blwf c + h h +c akhn c + h h + c where h is halant and c is consonant. I implemented this in Gubbi(Still has some issues), GSUB rules can be referred here. https://github.com/aravindavk/Gubbi/blob/master/tools/gsub.fea On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Sneha Kore wrote: > hello, > > As already specified in the original mail , Lohit kannada needs some > improvements , I would like to mention that I have already gone through the > task of GSUB cleanup & started to work for Glyph naming task. > > Regards, > Sneha Kore > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Pravin Satpute" > >To: lohit-devel-list at redhat.com > >Cc: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com, hallimanearavind at gmail.com, > omshivaprakash at gmail.com, skore at redhat.com, svenkate at redhat.com, > samjnaa at gmail.com, i18n at lists.fedoraproject.org, > indlinux-group at lists.sourceforge.net > >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:56:39 PM > >Subject: Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! > > > >Hi All, > > > > First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, planning > >for Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the next > >week. > > > > Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other > >script fonts like > > > > 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati > > 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari > > 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag > > 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with > >Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly everywhere) > > > > There are some more things needs attention > > > > 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by > >Shriramana [a] > > 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] > > > > From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit > >Kannada carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be good if we > >can get rid of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me to fix > >this. > > > > These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need > >attention please let me know. On the top of this need lots of help from > >you all for testing activity. > > > > Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 repo. Once > >get ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. > > > > > >Best Regards, > >Pravin Satpute > > > >a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 > >b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 > >c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 > > > -- Regards Aravinda | ?????? http://aravindavk.in -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From psatpute at redhat.com Thu Oct 24 03:32:13 2013 From: psatpute at redhat.com (Pravin Satpute) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:02:13 +0530 Subject: [Lohit-devel-list] Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! In-Reply-To: References: <5267B26F.80702@redhat.com> <1474916485.6921704.1382529621103.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <526894BD.2010405@redhat.com> On ??????? 24 ??????? 2013 08:08 ?.??., Aravinda VK wrote: > Hi, > > As per my observations only blwf and akhn has difference between knda > and knda2. Following table shows the difference > > knda knd2 > blwf c + h h +c > akhn c + h h + c > > where h is halant and c is consonant. > > I implemented this in Gubbi(Still has some issues), GSUB rules can be > referred here. > https://github.com/aravindavk/Gubbi/blob/master/tools/gsub.fea That is very useful. We definitely refer gubbi feature file. Thanks, Pravin Satpute > > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Sneha Kore > wrote: > > hello, > > As already specified in the original mail , Lohit kannada needs > some improvements , I would like to mention that I have already > gone through the task of GSUB cleanup & started to work for Glyph > naming task. > > Regards, > Sneha Kore > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Pravin Satpute" > > >To: lohit-devel-list at redhat.com > >Cc: pavanaja at vishvakannada.com > , hallimanearavind at gmail.com > , omshivaprakash at gmail.com > , skore at redhat.com > , svenkate at redhat.com > , samjnaa at gmail.com > , i18n at lists.fedoraproject.org > , > indlinux-group at lists.sourceforge.net > > >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:56:39 PM > >Subject: Lohit2: Improvement plans for Lohit-Kannada !! > > > >Hi All, > > > > First some update on existing activities of lohit2 project, > planning > >for Lohit-Devanagari Beta and Lohit-Gujarati Alpha release by the > next > >week. > > > > Regarding Lohit-Kannada other than same improvements for other > >script fonts like > > > > 1. Following AGL while renaming lohit-gujarati > > 2. Feature file separate as done in lohit-devanagari > > 3. Supporting "knda" and "knd2" Opent type tag > > 4. Thorough testing with Harfbuzz and Uniscribe (will test with > >Windows XP as well to make sure webfonts will render correctly > everywhere) > > > > There are some more things needs attention > > > > 1. Removing unnecessary glyphs. Bug for that already reported by > >Shriramana [a] > > 2. Some other needed attentions are [b][c] > > > > From designing perspective, i dont know why each glyph in Lohit > >Kannada carries negative witdh, see right bearing. It will be > good if we > >can get rid of it. It will be appreciated if someone can help me > to fix > >this. > > > > These are the points from myside, if anything missing or need > >attention please let me know. On the top of this need lots of > help from > >you all for testing activity. > > > > Development is going on https://github.com/pravins/lohit2 > repo. Once > >get ready for alpha, will merge it main lohit repo. > > > > > >Best Regards, > >Pravin Satpute > > > >a. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825115 > >b. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825081 > >c. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827516 > > > > > > > -- > Regards > Aravinda | ?????? > http://aravindavk.in -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: