[lvm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/4] Eliminate _check_lv_status's 'name' argument

[Mike Snitzer]

On Tue, Sep 29 2009 at 11:22am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com> wrote:

> _check_lv_status's 'name' argument sometimes contains a name of a VG and
> sometimes name of an LV, so using it in generic code would be dangerous.
> 'name' was never used for anything other than progress_display.
> 
> The next patch will properly split out context specific
> progress_display.

Updated patch is available here:
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/snapshot-merge/lvm2/LVM2-2.02.54/lvm-poll-drop-argument-name-in-_check_lv_status.patch