[lvm-devel] LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW ./WHATS_NEW_DM libdm/libdm-de ...
Petr Rockai
prockai at redhat.com
Wed Apr 7 22:31:44 UTC 2010
Hi,
agk at sourceware.org writes:
> --- LVM2/libdm/libdm-deptree.c 2010/03/25 18:22:04 1.72
> +++ LVM2/libdm/libdm-deptree.c 2010/04/07 20:04:42 1.73
> @@ -1047,9 +1047,14 @@
>
> /* Refresh open_count */
> if (!_info_by_dev(dinfo->major, dinfo->minor, 1, &info) ||
> - !info.exists || info.open_count)
> + !info.exists)
> continue;
>
> + if (info.open_count) {
> + r = 0;
> + continue;
> + }
As far as I can tell, this r = 0 is new behaviour that breaks a number
of tests and may break user scripts. Is it necessary?
Yours,
Petr.
More information about the lvm-devel
mailing list