[lvm-devel] [Patch] Split mirror fixes

[Jonathan Brassow]

On Jul 12, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Jonathan Brassow wrote:

> 2) Even though we are grabbing devices to split off from
>   the original mirror from the end of the sub_lv list,
>   why are they the numericly first LVs (i.e lv_mimage_0
>   instead of lv_mimage_3)?  You would expect to have
>   lv_mimage_[01] in your original instead of lv_mimage_[23].
>   Will answer this before checking in the patch - can be
>   answered by gdb and tracking structures...  I also have
>   yet to ensure that this doesn't affect the specification
>   of devices to be removed, since they are shifted to the
>   end of the list before being pulled.

The list was being reordered before the sub-lvs were pulled.  I've  
fixed this in a separate patch.

  brassow