[lvm-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Pool locking code
Joe Thornber
thornber at redhat.com
Wed Mar 23 18:41:21 UTC 2011
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:57 +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> If there would be just 1 vg read for 7200 activate call - obviously
> I'd not
> need to play with this dm_pool locking :)
>
> So there is 7200 vg reads - which will use this one locked pool with
> my patch set:
ok, so I'm playing catch-up; This locking functionality is debug only.
In the near term the set/restore api wont be needed at all, at which
point that interface can be removed. We should leave the locking side
for regression tests.
So I'll ACK the patch.
- Joe
More information about the lvm-devel
mailing list