[lvm-devel] master - pvmove: reinstantiate clustered pvmove

[Eric Ren]

On 02/15/2018 09:20 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> Got it.
>>>
>>> We did some more 'brainstorming' - with a result, that it actually 
>>> doesn't
>>> matter if LV is activate on more nodes - as long as there is 
>>> cmirrord running,
>>> and lvm2 is able to activate LV on multiple nodes - it should be always
>>> possible to create proper tree mapping.
>>>
>>> But let's just see how it will work in reality - it will require 
>>> some more thinking....
>>>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I've pushed 2 new commits for pvmove and its clustered use-case.
>
> So please give them some testing if you can spot something strange or 
> if you think there could be some better logic behind it.

Hi Zdenek,

Thanks very much. I am just back from holiday today, will find time to 
have a try.

Regards,
Eric

>
> I've tried to accept wider range of active LVs - but it's for
> further testing still whether it's got any better.
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2018-February/msg00038.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2018-February/msg00039.html
>
> Regards
>
> Zdenek
>
> -- 
> lvm-devel mailing list
> lvm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/lvm-devel
>