[mgmt] Why CheckApply, and not Check Apply ?
Julien Pivotto
roidelapluie at inuits.eu
Thu Feb 9 19:12:39 UTC 2017
Hi,
I am wondering why the choice has been made to have a CheckApply
command, and not one Check and one Apply command?
Even the name of the function look like it should have been two
different functions.
I plan to have for the augeas resource that distinction:
CheckApply would look like:
if check {
apply
}
what do you think about that? why is there one function to do two
separated things?
Is that okay that for my resource I internally split that in 2?
Thanks!
--
(o- Julien Pivotto
//\ Open-Source Consultant
V_/_ Inuits - https://www.inuits.eu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/mgmtconfig-list/attachments/20170209/d34311e0/attachment.sig>
More information about the mgmtconfig-list
mailing list