[Ovirt-devel] [PATCH] Add task list to dashboard
David Lutterkort
lutter at redhat.com
Wed Jan 14 01:00:41 UTC 2009
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:42 -0500, Scott Seago wrote:
> Scott Seago wrote:
> > Well the task type distinction is more for the benefit of taskomatic
> > than for users -- the task type determines the behavior of the task.
> > Different object pointed to, different ruby class implementation, etc.
> > If there's a need for a more human-friendly categorization of tasks,
> > we could consider adding it, but we shouldn't mix that up w/ 'type'
> > which has model and class implications. In addition, a category-like
> > 'type' field would allow us to distinguish different types of VM tasks.
> >
> As mentioned in the comments for 4, we can group task types for
> filtering purposes, although we should still display the actual task
> type. All we need to do to get moving on the grouping is to decide what
> to group.
I would just hide the storage/storage volume distinction; the item and
action columns should make it clear enough to the user what that task is
about.
David
More information about the ovirt-devel
mailing list