[Ovirt-devel] oVirt Node Fedora Feature Status

[Athmane Madjoudj]

On 07/30/2011 03:16 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ovirt_Node_Spin
>
> I noticed that virt-manager-tui is in rawhide finally, but the package
> name implies that it's not going to be in f16?
> virt-manager-tui.noarch    0.9.0-4.fc17       rawhide
>
> Cole, is this intentional or just smth that we need to follow up on?
>
> Also, I've noticed that ovirt-node needs refreshing...  iirc apevec did
> tag/release of 2.0.1 from ovirt-node git (as an aside 'News' section of
> website still says 2.0.0 is latest in git)
> ovirt-node.noarch          2.0.0-1.fc16       rawhide
>
> Alan, what are the current blockers preventing us from getting a 2.0.1
> ISO hosted on ovirt.org download page?
>
> Lastly...  We've gotten approvals from the Design and QE leads for the
> oVirt Node Spin Feature on their respective mailing lists.  But Spin SIG
> seems to have disbanded.  I'm following up with Fedora program manager
> (cc'd) to see what our next steps can be here.
>
> Cheers,
>

AFAIK Jared Smith is taking SPIN SIG issue

IRC Log:

19:36:00 <athmane> is ovirt node cloud-sig business ?
19:36:43 <rbergeron> athmane: it's more spins-sig business, at the 
moment, or "what to do in lieu of lack of spins-sig movement" business
19:36:56 <rbergeron> i know jsmith is looking into it at the moment.
19:36:57 <athmane> ok
19:37:22 <rbergeron> if it's not getting traction, we could perhaps take 
a look at it, but let's hold off and see where it gets in the next few days.
19:37:37 <rbergeron> but technically it's spins-sig stuffs.
19:37:41 <jsmith> Gimme until early next week to try to get some 
consensus on what to do to move forward
19:38:12 <athmane> jsmith: ok

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj