[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pam_opie module

Bryan Andregg wrote:
> >>  	So, if we get xdm working properly with PAM than any 
> >>  	new authentication scheme that is implemented in PAM
> >>  	(SecurID, fingerprint readers, whatever!) should then
> >>  	work with xdm with no further coding.
> >
> >Yes, but you need appropriate conversation functions first. The problem now is
> >that for many applications those don't exist.
> This is exactly the case, how can one implement a new authentication method if
> the authentication conversation is different than the standard 'username:
> password:'

Is there anyone out there that knows enough about xdm to make such a change?
If there is, that individual might like to take a look at some sample
X-conversation code in:


(Its been gathering dust for months...)


               Linux-PAM, libpwdb, Orange-Linux and Linux-GSS

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []