[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: 2nd call: binary incompatibility



On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Michael K. Johnson wrote:

> >In the former case, Solaris decided to require the pamh argument to be
> >supplied to the pam_strerror() function.  We (in keeping with the PAM RFC)
> >do not.
> 
> That's a change we should definitely make.  (It will probably cause me to
> tear my hair out later, though.)

That is the easy one. We can fix all modules coming with Linux-PAM
distribution in one shot, the other one - the conversation function thing
- is more tricky

> In any case, remember to change the libpam soname when you make the change!

I'd vote for bumbing up the number to 0.60 or something like that, just to
have a round number :-)

Best wishes,

Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton   --   gafton@redhat.com   --   Red Hat Software, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []