[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Another 2nd call: binary incompatibility

"Michael K. Johnson" writes:
>I'm assuming you will change misc_conv() to match when you make the
>change, and I can move to using misc_conv() instead of my hacked-up
>local versions.
>However, I don't know what the difference is; I don't see the discussion
>of this in the messages that discussed the pam_strerror() function earlier.
>Could you elaborate?

Now it's my turn to complain about a lack of response ;-) ;-)

Seriously, all the discussion has been about pam_strerror(), which
-- realistically speaking -- is an plain, simple, easy-to-fix thing.
Going through code to change it to put a pamh in all instances of
pam_stererror() is just not much work.

HOWEVER, I can imagine that a lot more work would be involved in
changing, and especially testing, conversation code.  Can we please
talk about what the changes to the conversation code are?



"Magazines all too frequently lead to books and should be regarded by the
 prudent as the heavy petting of literature."            -- Fran Lebowitz

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []