[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Linux-PAM-0.59preE



On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Andrew Morgan wrote:

> I see your point.  I will rename 0.59preD+(rhosts patch) 0.60 proper.
> And then make my next release as 0.61.  In the meantime, 0.59preE is
> as close to 0.61 as anything.  [Expect all this tomorrow.]

Okay, if you are in the game, let's play it to the end :-). I haven't had
the time to look at pam_env yet, and there is supposed to be a bug or
something in there.

I will try to fight it today, so that 0.60 will be a true 'stable'
release. (or Andrew - you could release it as 0.59 proper and have 0.60
add the pam_env patch, if it will take longer to spot the bug or decide
that there is no bug involved).

> I could not agree more: but you'll need a new feature for Red Hat
> Linux 6.0 ;^).

Oh-ho ! until 6.0 comes out, let's think about 5.1... :-)

Best wishes,

Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton   --   gafton@redhat.com   --   Red Hat Software, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []