[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pam_unix or pam_pwdb?



I believe so.

Cheers

Andrew

Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> 
> The way I see it:
> first there was pam_unix. It was lacking many features. Then came pam_pwdb,
> which has support for db file format, as well as NIS.
> THEN, glibc-2.1 got a decent NSS, and pam_unix could suddently be used for
> many different authentication formats (file, db, nis, ldap w/o shadow, etc).
> pam_pwdb remains the same.
> 
> So, is pam_unix again the best one to use?
> 
> --
> Andreas Hasenack
> andreas@conectiva.com.br
> BIG Linux user!
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe pam-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []