[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: /etc/pam.d/files



On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:31:31AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I personally think it would be good if distributions took this route.
> RedHat's default for /etc/pam.d/other right now is to use pam_deny for
> everything, but this really seems unnecessary to me when the config file could
> be put to much better use.

You want an otherwise-unconfigured service to default to deny, so that
you know you haven't left any doors open that you didn't mean to.

Nalin





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []