[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: pam_unix vs pam_pwdb



Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> 
[]
> > Lastly, per the previous post regarding pam_stack.so, it is included on my
> > redhat 6.2 system with updated rpm pam-0.72.
> 
> For the errata release, I just built what we had in the tree.  There
> are a couple of problems with that version of pam_stack that have
> since been fixed, but we haven't issued an update for it since I didn't
> expect anyone to use it (it's certainly not used by default on 6.2).
> 

You can grab this from rawhide or beta7 at ftp.  Use at own risk!
BTW, I use new pam releases, and I like the new approach. :)

Regards,
 Michael.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []