[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fwd: [PAM-Announce] Linux-PAM 0.75 released]



Nikolay Pelov wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> 
> >                           ** WARNING **
> >
> > This release contains backwardly incompatible changes to
> > libpam. Prior versions were buggy - see bugfix for Bug 129775.
> >
> >                          ** WARNING **
> 
> Somehow, I can't seem to find this bug #129775.

Excellent point.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=229775&group_id=6663&atid=106663

Mmm. Did sourceforge pull a fast one on me? Could it be that all of the
bug-id's mysteriously got bumped by +100000?

If you scan down the CHANGELOG file, you'll observe that most of the bug
ids begin with 1, but then if you browse sourceforge you'll see that
none of the 'closed' PAM bugs start with this digit. I tried a few
bugids at random, and 'adding' 100k appears to be the decryption key.

Grr.

Cheers

Andrew





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []