pam_tally and fail_locktime
Dan Hollis
goemon at sasami.anime.net
Wed Oct 5 00:15:37 UTC 2005
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Dan Hollis wrote:
>> pam_abl works great in general, though it doesnt work at all on x86_64
>> at the moment. maybe someone more clued on pam can fix it.
>> http://www.hexten.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
> I understand that the way pam_abl detects the end of a failed auth
> attempt is dependent upon services calling the PAM functions in a
> particular way - perhaps this is different on x86_64s to their predecessors?
"After doing some tests, I have found that the cleanup function registered
by pam_set_data is never called."
whether the bug is in x86_64 pam or in pam_abl is unknown at the moment.
but ia32 pam_abl works fine.
if the api for x86_64 pam is different, sounds like a pam bug to me. but
afaik no other applications that use pam have breakage like this, so i'm
going to assume it's a pam_abl bug.
-Dan
More information about the Pam-list
mailing list