pam_tally and fail_locktime

Dan Hollis goemon at sasami.anime.net
Wed Oct 5 00:15:37 UTC 2005


On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Dan Hollis wrote:
>> pam_abl works great in general, though it doesnt work at all on x86_64
>> at the moment. maybe someone more clued on pam can fix it.
>> http://www.hexten.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
> I understand that the way pam_abl detects the end of a failed auth
> attempt is dependent upon services calling the PAM functions in a
> particular way - perhaps this is different on x86_64s to their predecessors?

"After doing some tests, I have found that the cleanup function registered 
by pam_set_data is never called."

whether the bug is in x86_64 pam or in pam_abl is unknown at the moment. 
but ia32 pam_abl works fine.

if the api for x86_64 pam is different, sounds like a pam bug to me. but 
afaik no other applications that use pam have breakage like this, so i'm 
going to assume it's a pam_abl bug.

-Dan




More information about the Pam-list mailing list