Including pam_faildelay module in PAM distribution
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk at suse.de
Thu Nov 9 14:41:03 UTC 2006
On Sun, Oct 22, Bjoern Voigt wrote:
> Why we don't include the module pam_faildelay in the standard PAM
> distribution? This has some benefits:
I wrote it more or less new using the extended Linux-PAM functions
and wrote some documentation for it. It is now in the Linux-PAM CVS.
> * users can find it easier since it's in their distribution
> * Linux distributors can configure the applications with fail delay
> be default
> * the module will be maintained
Hm, adding it to Linux-PAM CVS does not mean that it will be maintained.
If nobody maintians it, it could be that it will be, at some point,
be removed again.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk at suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5 D-90409 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = 8C6B FD92 EE0F 42ED F91A 6A73 6D1A 7F05 2E59 24BB
More information about the Pam-list
mailing list