[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PAM] LDAP + PAM



See and I thought it was because  putting the sufficient pam_ldap after pam_unix2 would be redundant.
AFAIK, if you add use_ldap to the appropriate lines
of the /etc/security/pam_unix2.conf then you get the desired "sufficient" behaviour without the risk of duplicate prompts.



----- Original Message ----
From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk suse de>
To: pam-list redhat com
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:22:05 PM
Subject: Re: [PAM] LDAP + PAM

On Wed, Oct 11, Net Warrior wrote:

> and.. what did you mean with this?, what's wrong?

Nothing is wrong with that, some people only are not aware
about the existence of this module.
 
> >commmon-auth
> >auth required pam_env.so
> >auth required pam_unix2.so
>                 ????????

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk         http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/      kukuk suse de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH       Maxfeldstr. 5       D-90409 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = 8C6B FD92 EE0F 42ED F91A  6A73 6D1A 7F05 2E59 24BB

_______________________________________________
Pam-list mailing list
Pam-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list







[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]