pam_access and a .d directory
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Sep 6 18:40:02 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 20:26 +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > On our systems we use pam_access quite extensively. We have a base-set
> > of rules we apply to every server and then some servers require special
> > rules. We'd love to be able to use something like:
> >
> > /etc/security/access.conf <-- default rules
> > /etc/security/access.conf.d/*.conf <-- additional rules concatenated
> > onto the end of the whole set.
> >
> > Just like with all the other .d directory changes it would allow us to
> > drop a file onto the system to let that work w/o having to modify the
> > access.conf itself.
>
> The problem is: the order is important, the first matched rule
> found will be used. with a .d directory, you don't have this
> control anymore and you can get bad side effects, depending on at
> which time which files are created.
Sure - just like with all other .d files - you have to do tricks to make
sure they are loaded in the right order, certainly.
I don't think this is much different than the .d configs used for apache
or even /etc/profile.d/
-sv
More information about the Pam-list
mailing list