How to stack PAM without pam_stack

[Andrew Morgan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> In that case something like:
>>
>> auth   [success=2 default=ignore] pam_ldap.so
>> auth   [success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix2.so
>> auth   requisite       pam_fail.so
>> auth   required        some_other_pam.so
> 
> pam_fail.so cannot be found. Is this intended?

I meant pam_deny.so! But not being found will yield a similar effect(!)

Cheers

Andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG3j69QheEq9QabfIRAmW1AJ0WAlqtnrnNsN40irK1tj246627lQCeK1U/
XwDvRNS+FpNZpSjyQXhLjyI=
=jHnM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----