Does `@include' equivalent to `include'?

[Tomas Mraz]

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:46 -0700, shaul Karl wrote:
> Am I right that the directive @include, including the
> prefix character @, is not documented? 
The @include directive is not supported by Linux-PAM upstream at all.
There might be some distributions which patch it in.
This directive is equivalent to using the regular include directive for
all of the stacks and as it thus doesn't bring anything new and really
useful, the patch was not applied to upstream sources.
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb