pam list size limit?

Jon Miller jonebird at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 00:06:02 UTC 2009


Are you sure the issue is with pam_access? How many entries do you get when
you run "getent group <grpname>" ?
Finally, what level SP are you at on your SLES10 machine? If you're not at
SP2, you could try updating to that. I've found SP2 to have solved a lot of
issues.

-- Jon Miller

2009/1/28 Wendy Palm <wendy at cray.com>

>  We have a site that uses pam to regulate user logins, and has a unix
> group in excess of 2500 user entries which is specified in the access.conf
> file.
>
>
>
> They were running SLES9 (pam-0.77-221.4) and had no problems.  However,
> updating to SLES10 (pam-0.99.6.3-28.8), they are now having problems with
> the group list truncating at about 1100 user entries.
>
>
>
> Was some default limit changed?  I checked the archives, but didn't see
> anything blatent announcing this.  I checked the ChangeLog in the source
> code and found an entry that is suspicious (2005-12-21  Tomas Mraz
> simplifying evaluate_ingroup), but again, nothing blatent.
>
>
>
> What is the limit?  How can I change it (preferably without recompiling)?
> Is this at all possible?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wendy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Wendy Palm
>
> Security Software Engineer
>
> wendy at cray dot com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pam-list mailing list
> Pam-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/attachments/20090128/d8978408/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pam-list mailing list