Re[2]: pam lsm

[spaesani at mail.com]

Thanks for your reply.
I did some reading and found that the called cmds/appl have to implement PAM functions or nothing much happens.
Thanks again for your time.

--
spaesani at mail.com Friday, 12 August 2016, 04:36AM -04:00 from Matus UHLAR - fantomas  uhlar at fantomas.sk :

>On 11.08.16 18:08,  spaesani at mail.com wrote:
>>Is PAM a linux security module (policy really)?
>
>no.
>
>>If not how does it usurp file permissions? 
>
>it does not.
>
>>Is the kernel modified for PAM?  Or is there some other general kernel feature like LSM being used?  If so which one?
>
>no, no.
>
>
>-- 
>Matus UHLAR - fantomas,  uhlar at fantomas.sk ;  http://www.fantomas.sk/
>Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
>Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
>BSE = Mad Cow Desease ... BSA = Mad Software Producents Desease
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pam-list mailing list
>Pam-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pam-list/attachments/20160813/24b38433/attachment.htm>