[Patchew-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] Make Import Command use Rest

Fam Zheng famz at redhat.com
Tue Jul 3 02:50:17 UTC 2018


On Mon, 07/02 18:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 10:27, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, 07/02 13:40, Shubham Jain wrote:
> >> Right. So in REST we are giving permissions to import any authenticated
> >> user but the projects would be only imported to recognised projects. We can
> >> give warning in our client when there are no messages are imported.
> >
> > Or maybe it's even better to give warnings when projects recognize the patch but
> > permission is lacking.
> > 
> > But for the importer running in the background, making sure the exit status is
> > not 0 when any error happens is the highest priority, this includes any
> > authentication and permission issues.
> 
> An unauthenticated user will always return 1, because POST will fail
> with 403.  However, for an authenticated _but unauthorized_ user that
> sends /api/v1/messages/, the response will be successful.
> 
> In patchew-cli, returning success is probably okay for a generic user,
> but indeed Fam is right, it is not okay for an importer that runs in the
> background.
> 
> Shubham, please modify the patch to return an exit status of 1 when the
> project_list is empty, so that the background importer signals the error
> promptly.

Do we return empty project_list if the message is already imported before? If so
there should be no error. Similarly if the message format is valid but it
doesn't belong to any known project, it should be nop and no error.

Fam

> 
> The API doesn't tell you which projects have not had permission, since
> it only returns (in the 201 Created response) the resources that were
> created.  However, the common case of "I forgot to put the user in the
> importer group" will be caught just fine.  Special users should not be
> assigned as maintainers!





More information about the Patchew-devel mailing list