[Patternfly] Moving forward with the Search pattern

[Liz Blanchard]

On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Emily Dirsh <edirsh at redhat.com> wrote:

> Agreed. I don't have any problem breaking the pattern up, particularly leaving off the additional functionality such as saved search and attributes. Anyone have suggestions for what to call it other than contextual search? I'm not attached to the name, but we do need to differentiate it from global search.
> 
+1

Liz

> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Malini Rao" <mrao at redhat.com>
>> To: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
>> Cc: patternfly at redhat.com
>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:35:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Patternfly] Moving forward with the Search pattern
>> 
>> Sounds good to me! On the topic of innovation, while I usually would not like
>> to deny credit for innovation (:)), I think the search team decided on what
>> specific interactions that are out there in use in the context of search
>> that we want to put together for our use in enterprise IT projects. I don't
>> think we necessarily invented anything totally new. Having said that, like
>> all pattern work, this should be usability tested as well and tweaked with
>> any insights.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Malini
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
>> To: patternfly at redhat.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 3:16:14 PM
>> Subject: [Patternfly] Moving forward with the Search pattern
>> 
>> 
>> Yesterday Robb, Kyle, Brian and I met on several topics concerning PatternFly
>> and the subject of Search came up.  We agreed that there is a need for a
>> basic search widget that can be added to our library and that Robb should
>> take the action to prototype this.  I wanted to make sure, however, that
>> this leverages the pattern work on contextual search that had been done last
>> year.
>> 
>> I went back and reviewed the pattern draft for contextual search
>> (https://www.patternfly.org/wikis/patterns/pattern-development/draft-patterns/contextual-search/)
>> and wanted to propose a few changes that I think will make it easier to move
>> forward with this.  My proposal is to separate this into three patterns:
>> 
>> - Basic Search that will include the "Basic Contextual Search" functionality.
>> - Attribute Search that will include the "Attribute-Based Contextual Search"
>> functionality.
>> - "Smart Search" that will include other optional features like suggestions
>> and the ability to bookmark or recall saved searches.
>> 
>> My reasoning for this approach is to be able to introduce this functionality
>> to the PF library in phases.  While I think lots of very innovative design
>> work went into the original draft of this pattern, to me, many of the
>> features that make up what I'm calling "smart search" are unproven from both
>> a technical feasibility and usability standpoint.  What I'd like to move
>> ahead with is a Basic Search pattern/widget (which I believe has received
>> some testing) as this seems to be where there is the most need.  We can
>> phase in other extensions to this after we've had time for more prototyping
>> and testing.
>> 
>> I'd also like to move away from the term "contextual search," unless people
>> object.  A quick Google search reveals that this term is being used by
>> Google, Yahoo, and other to reference the use of contextual metadata (e.g.
>> your location) to refine search results.  This is certainly not what we were
>> talking about in this pattern.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Patternfly mailing list
>> Patternfly at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Patternfly mailing list
>> Patternfly at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Patternfly mailing list
> Patternfly at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly