[Patternfly] PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting Oct 8

[Brian Dellascio]

Sure, I'll work with Joe to grab a couple of things. 

Thanks, 
Brian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Leslie Hinson" <lhinson at redhat.com>
To: "Brian Dellascio" <bdellasc at redhat.com>
Cc: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>, uxd-team at redhat.com, plightfoot at redhat.com, julim at redhat.com, lclayton at redhat.com, rhamilto at redhat.com, aschell at redhat.com, jsniezek at redhat.com, sclark at redhat.com, fweinbre at redhat.com, lsurette at redhat.com, gcardoso at redhat.com, joqian at redhat.com, wraines at redhat.com, sdoyle at redhat.com, patternfly at redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:45:56 AM
Subject: Re: PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting Oct 8

Brian: Before or during the meeting, could you share a link or screen grabs of the JBOSS prototype and identify some examples about what is viewed as throwaway vs PF? This will help give me some context to the matter. 

Thanks! 
Leslie


On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Brian Dellascio <bdellasc at redhat.com> wrote:

> Thanks, its pretty timely as the issue has already come up RE: the JBoss prototype
> 
> Thanks, 
> Brian
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
> To: "Brian Dellascio" <bdellasc at redhat.com>
> Cc: uxd-team at redhat.com, plightfoot at redhat.com, julim at redhat.com, lclayton at redhat.com, rhamilto at redhat.com, aschell at redhat.com, jsniezek at redhat.com, sclark at redhat.com, fweinbre at redhat.com, lsurette at redhat.com, gcardoso at redhat.com, lhinson at redhat.com, joqian at redhat.com, wraines at redhat.com, sdoyle at redhat.com, patternfly at redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:39:56 AM
> Subject: Re: PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting Oct 8
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Agree that this is a good topic to discuss.  Will make sure to reserve some time for this on the agenda.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Dellascio" <bdellasc at redhat.com>
> To: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
> Cc: uxd-team at redhat.com, plightfoot at redhat.com, julim at redhat.com, lclayton at redhat.com, rhamilto at redhat.com, aschell at redhat.com, jsniezek at redhat.com, sclark at redhat.com, fweinbre at redhat.com, lsurette at redhat.com, gcardoso at redhat.com, lhinson at redhat.com, joqian at redhat.com, wraines at redhat.com, sdoyle at redhat.com, patternfly at redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:30:51 AM
> Subject: Re: PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting Oct 8
> 
> Other topic:
> 
> How should we determine which new UI elements of a prototype should be "throwaway" vs. "on the way to Patternfly"? There are (and will be) things we try in prototypes that are not part of a PF pattern, but very specific to a product's need. Do we:
> 
> - develop everything so it <<could>> be further integrated into PF? 
> - just get it working so we can get the concept tested, integrated into the product that needs it, then worry about integration into PF later?
> - combination of both?
> 
> I've reached out to Charles to give me some high-level estimates on which approach makes sense. Obviously, we want to utilize the budget in a way that gets us the testing results we need to verify a design/concept, but it would also be nice to get some UI elements on that path to possible PatternFly integration further down the road...
> 
> Bottom line, what's the ideal we strive for?
> 
> Thanks, 
> Brian
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com>
> To: uxd-team at redhat.com, plightfoot at redhat.com, julim at redhat.com, lclayton at redhat.com, rhamilto at redhat.com, aschell at redhat.com, jsniezek at redhat.com, sclark at redhat.com, fweinbre at redhat.com, lsurette at redhat.com, bdellasc at redhat.com, gcardoso at redhat.com, lhinson at redhat.com, joqian at redhat.com, cshinn at redhat.com, wraines at redhat.com, sdoyle at redhat.com, patternfly at redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 5:08:23 PM
> Subject: Re: PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting Oct 8
> 
> For the week's meeting I've asked Ju to talk a bit about use of Trello and how we can more effectively use this as a tool for planning and tracking PF iterations.
> 
> Other topics?
> 
> Matt
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> The following meeting has been modified: 
> 
> Subject: PatternFly Bi-Weekly Meeting 
> Organizer: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano at redhat.com> 
> 
> Location: "3s102 - Loon Mountain - BOS" <3s102-bos at redhat.com> 
> Resources: "3s102 - Loon Mountain - BOS" <3s102-bos at redhat.com> (3s102 - Loon Mountain - BOS) 
> Time: 3:00:00 PM - 4:00:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Recurrence : Every 2 week(s) on Wednesday No end date Effective Jul 16, 2014 
> 
> Invitees: uxd-team at redhat.com; plightfoot at redhat.com; julim at redhat.com; lclayton at redhat.com; rhamilto at redhat.com; aschell at redhat.com; jsniezek at redhat.com; sclark at redhat.com; fweinbre at redhat.com; lsurette at redhat.com; bdellasc at redhat.com ... 
> 
> 
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* 
> 
> Changing the frequency to bi-weekly beginning Jul 16. Attendance is optional and the meeting is open to all, so feel free to share with others. An agenda will be published prior to each meeting. 
> 
> Blue Jeans call info: 
> 
> To join the Meeting: 
> https://bluejeans.com/1639072502 
> 
> To join via Browser: 
> https://bluejeans.com/1639072502/browser 
> 
> To join with Lync: 
> https://bluejeans.com/1639072502/lync 
> 
> To join via Room System: 
> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or- 199.48.152.152 
> Meeting ID: 1639072502 
> 
> 
> To join via Phone: 
> 1) Dial: 
> +18004518679 
> +12127295016 
> (see all numbers - https://www.intercallonline.com/listNumbersByCode.action?confCode=1639072502) 
> 2) Enter Conference ID: 1639072502