[Patternfly] Technical questions and ideas

Andres Galante agalante at redhat.com
Mon Aug 29 12:02:17 UTC 2016


Hi Vojtech,

Sorry for keep you waiting, this email got lost during my PTO.

I couldn't agree more, PatternFly CSS needs to be modular and easier to
consume.

I wanted start a discussion with the community about it when I have a
clearer idea of a path to move forward. But since you've mention it, if
there any though/solution you'd like to share?

Thanks a lot,

Andrés



On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Vojtech Szocs <vszocs at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> sorry for my late response, I wasn't subscribed to PF mailing list :[
>
> > I have opened a PR to address the issue with d3 and shrinkwrap here:
> > https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly/pull/412
>
> Nice! This fix should be part of PatternFly 3.9.0 if I see correctly.
>
> > Regarding bootstrap-treeview, we had already removed bower in our
> upcoming changes to treeview later this month, but I have gone ahead and
> added another PR since you are having issues now:
> > https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly-bootstrap-treeview/pull/4
>
> Thanks! This fix should be part of patternfly-bootstrap-treeview 1.0.1.
>
> But I think you'll also need to update:
>
>   # still contains "patternfly-bootstrap-treeview" .. "version": "1.0.0"
>   https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly/blob/master/npm-shrinkwrap.json
>
> to make sure it's effectively used by PatternFly.
>
> > The hope is to remove bower as a dependency and move to NPM, as well as
> update node (if you'll notice, we still build on node 0.10).
>
> Big +1 on that one.
>
> (in oVirt Dashboard, we're using the latest LTS of Node which is v4)
>
> > I am not sure regarding your question about Patternfly css - you may
> want to discuss with Andres when he gets back.
>
> That would be great.
>
> Thanks again for stepping up and fixing those issues, much appreciated!
>
> Regards,
> Vojtech
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vojtech Szocs" <vszocs at redhat.com>
> > To: "patternfly" <patternfly at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Serena Doyle" <sdoyle at redhat.com>, "Oved Ourfali" <
> oourfali at redhat.com>, "Greg Sheremeta" <gshereme at redhat.com>,
> > "Ryan Barry" <rbarry at redhat.com>, "Martin Betak" <mbetak at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:13:11 PM
> > Subject: Technical questions and ideas
> >
> > Hello PatternFly team :-)
> >
> > Greg (CC'ed) and me are working on oVirt Dashboard UI and we have
> > some technical questions regarding PatternFly reference impl. [1]
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly
> >
> > First of all, in our project, we'd like to lock down dependencies
> > via `npm shrinkwrap`. Let's say our package.json contains following
> > dependency:
> >
> >   "patternfly": "~3.8.1"
> >
> > but when we run `npm shrinkwrap` it fails with an error:
> >
> >   npm ERR! extraneous: d3 at 3.5.17
> >   /home/vszocs/work/releng-tools/specs/ovirt-engine-
> nodejs-modules/node_modules/patternfly/node_modules/d3
> >
> > this is because PatternFly package.json [2] is inconsistent with
> > npm-shrinkwrap.json [3] - "d3" is not specified in package.json.
> >
> > [2] https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly/blob/v3.8.1/package.json
> > [3] https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly/blob/v3.8.1/npm-
> shrinkwrap.json
> >
> > Can you please fix this? Should I open ticket on GitHub or JIRA?
> >
> > Second, when running `npm install --no-optional` in our project
> > (using above mentioned PatternFly dependency), we're getting:
> >
> >   sh: bower: command not found
> >   npm WARN optional dep failed, continuing
> >   patternfly-bootstrap-treeview at 1.0.0
> >
> > that's because patternfly-bootstrap-treeview does `bower install`
> > in its `install` script [4]. This basically assumes that Bower is
> > installed *prior* to executing `npm install`.
> >
> > [4]
> > https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly-bootstrap-treeview/
> blob/v1.0.0/package.json#L27
> >
> > Is there a way to fix that in patternfly-bootstrap-treeview?
> >
> > In today's world, where most projects just use `npm` to manage
> > all kinds of dependencies, Bower should not be a requirement
> > (or at least not for end users of PatternFly).
> >
> > Finally, I've seen Brian's e-mail on consolidating PatternFly
> > dependency management and I agree with the suggested approach:
> > use package.json to declare all of your dependencies and use
> > bower.json only for publishing/consuming PatternFly via Bower.
> >
> > One last thing - for now, PatternFly CSS includes CSS of all
> > its dependencies. While seemingly convenient, this generally
> > goes against the principle of multiple CSS processed & applied
> > one after another, with a natural consequence that you need to
> > instruct your JavaScript build tool to exclude CSS of Bootstrap,
> > C3 etc. [5]
> >
> > [5] https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly#using-wiredep
> >
> > Are there any plans to revisit this approach?
> >
> > My specs are:
> >
> >   $ node -v
> >   v4.4.6
> >
> >   $ npm -v
> >   2.15.5
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vojtech
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patternfly mailing list
> Patternfly at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/patternfly
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/patternfly/attachments/20160829/2c416c70/attachment.htm>


More information about the PatternFly mailing list