[Patternfly] Hide/Expand Advanced Options - Terminology

[Mary Clarke]

I am also not opposed to the suggestion.  The only 'con' I can see is the
added length for internationalization, but that is probably something we
can deal with.
Mary


On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Serena Doyle <sdoyle at redhat.com> wrote:

> Matthew,
>
> I wouldn't be opposed to that, I think we actually had it in some of our
> product mocks originally.  Can anyone think of any cons?
>
> Thanks,
> - Serena
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Matthew Stevens <mstevens at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I would like to make the following recommendation concerning PTNFLY-1831
>> <https://patternfly.atlassian.net/browse/PTNFLY-1831>:
>>
>> *Show Advanced Options / Hide Advanced Options*
>>
>> Currently, the label is always *Advanced Options*. Adding "Show" when
>> the options are hidden and "Hide" when they are displayed is clearer and
>> makes the action more explicit.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Matthew Stevens
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - Serena Chechile Doyle
> *UXD | Unified Management Experience*
> *Red Hat*
> *Cell* 508-769-7715 | *IRC* - serena | *Skype* - serenamarie125 |
> *Twitter* - @serenamarie125
>



-- 
*Mary Clarke*
Principal Interaction Designer
mclarke at redhat.com | 919.244.5040 | Raleigh, NC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/patternfly/attachments/20161213/10076e71/attachment.htm>