[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: PPC64 and nptl/shlib_versions



Jakub Jelinek writes:

> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:06:36PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
> > There is no line in nptl/shlib_versions for powerpc64. I assume it 
needs 
> > one? GLIBC_2.3

> Why? It is not needed:
> SONAME version gets assigned by nptl/shlib-versions's:

So when is it appropriate/required to specify a base release in 
nptl/shlib_versions?

Or stated another why does x86_64 have a line in nptl/shlib_versions
specifying GLIBC_2.2.5?




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]