[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: condvar performance in .59 vs .60



> dada1 wrote:
>
> > I did had such lockups in a real application.
>
> You never reported back whether the problem still exists.

Because I couldnt restart my busy servers with a version using
pthread_condvar

My program is using a hand coded version.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]