[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: condvar performance in .59 vs .60



Jamie Lokier wrote:

> A synchronous wakeup is like that.  If you can use requeue now,
> there's no need for it, although perhaps some userspace applications
> would appreciate being able to unblock a mutex or whatever without
> being preempted immediately?

It would definitely be worth a try.  I think many (most?) applications
would benefit from the waker continue to run.

-- 
--------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]