[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: binutils version



Im going to use hj lu's binutils. i will build the nptl later when i populate the root fs. i think something is broken with the nptl configure script. it insists on using the system as instead of the rebuilt static one in /tools/bin. maybe it will work properly in a chroot environment. free from the host system utilities.

On 2003-10-29 12:12:45 +0800 Bobber Cheng <mailofbb etang com> wrote:

I met the same problem. Although i installed laster cvs binutils(2.14.90 20031029) from :pserver:anoncvs sources redhat com:/cvs/src, the the problem remained.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:02:30 -0500, Jakub Jelinek <jakub redhat com> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:16:25PM +0800, Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. wrote:
im tyring tp build glibc-2.3.2 with nptl 0.60. it dies with:

checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for long double... yes
checking size of long double... 12
running configure fragment for ../glibc-2.3.2/sysdeps/i386/elf
running configure fragment for ../glibc-2.3.2/nptl/sysdeps/pthread
configure: error: CFI directive support in assembler is required

im using binutils 2.14 20030612

You need later binutils (e.g. current CVS or various recent Red Hat binutils rpms (RHEL3, Fedora Core TestN).

is nptl ready for testing?

IMNSHO not only for testing ;)


Jakub






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]