[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Thread starvation with mutex



> From: Ulrich Drepper [mailto:drepper redhat com]
> Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> 
> > NPTL is not fully POSIX compliant in that aspect, but even if it
> > were, the code would behave unpredictably (except when using
> > SCHED_RR or SCHED_FIFO).
> 
> Stop that garbage.  We don't claim following any of the realtime
> scheduling nonsense so it cannot be noncompliant.

Where do I say anybody claims anything? I am talking POSIX here.

Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault)




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]