[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RHL 9 - concerns



On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 04:03, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:14:05PM -0500, David Krider wrote: 
> > In my mind, there's quite a gap between the $800 and 3-year-lifecycle 
> > product and the $100 and 1-year-lifecycle product
> 
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure the Enterprise Linux ES has a $349 version with
> 5 years errata.
> See -
>   http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/purchase/
>   http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/rhlas_errata_policy.html
> 
> Havoc

Sorry, I'm still unclear on this.


Does this mean if I purchase RHL ES at $349 I get 5 years security
updates included for that price. Or will I additionally have to pay a
yearly subscription to RHN on top of this price?

 thanks.

 Dave.


-- 
Dr. David Holden. (Systems Developer)

Visit: Crystallography Journals Online <http://journals.iucr.org>

Thanks in advance:-
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See: <http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>

UK Privacy (R.I.P)  : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3
Public GPG key available on request.

-- 99% of politicians give the rest a bad name --
------------------------------------------------- 





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]