Cluster without shared disk, or over shared over NFS
Lon Hohberger
lhh at redhat.com
Fri Jan 28 20:03:12 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 15:28 -0500, Brian Beaver wrote:
> Thanks for the good info. So to summarize, Redhat clustering still appears
> to require "local" disks. The Netapp iSCSI solution just helps the drives
> appear local to the O/S. Any idea if Redhat clustering is allowed without
> the shared drive requirement, similar to Veritas clustering using multiple
> NIC's for heartbeats instead of a shared drive partition?
To be more precise, it's not heartbeating that needs it. You can use
heartbeat over bonded ethernet links for network redundancy if desired.
It's the semi-persistent shared cluster service and lock states and
cluster configuration information which is stored on the shared raw
partitions. The shared raw disks can be used as a backup to determine
whether the other node is online in 2-node clusters in the event of a
network partition.
-- Lon
More information about the Piranha-list
mailing list