AW: may be problem on NAT?
Alejandro Feijoo
alfeijoo at cesga.es
Mon Mar 6 16:24:37 UTC 2006
Well i dont understand so much
....
i create a bond0 on the servers, but what ip?....
can u explain much please :( and if u can... can u make an example?
A lot of tanks!
> Hi,
>
> i also had some troubles to create a two nodes LVS Cluster. Currently
> i'm using the direct routing method on two nodes. I made two bonding
> interfaces in the same ip subsegment. Why you aren't using the same -
> direct routing - method, or is there any matter that you have to use
> the NAT method?
>
> If you are using the Direct Routing Method you must to enter an
> iptables rulte on the real-sever interface. in my case that was the
> bond0 interface.
>
> E.G: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i bond0 or eth0/1 -p tcp -d
> 193.144.34.ZZZ --dport 80(what application is running on the Real
> Servers?) -j REDIRECT
>
> I hope this summary is useful for you!
>
> Regards,
> Philipp
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com] Im Auftrag von Alejandro
> Feijoo Gesendet: Montag, 6. März 2006 16:50
> An: piranha-list at redhat.com
> Betreff: may be problem on NAT?
>
>
> I want to create a cluster using piranha but i only have 2 servers, one
> for
> LVS router, one for LVS backup and both for Real Servers.
> The conf is the follow:
>
> ProliantA:
> public ip: 193.144.34.XXX
> private ip 10.1.1.1
> virtual public ip: 193.144.34.ZZZ
> virtual private ip: 10.1.1.3
> ProliantB:
> public ip: 193.144.34.YYY
> private ip 10.1.1.2
>
>
> I run piranha and make the following config:
> serial_no = 143
> primary = 193.144.34.XXX
>
>
> primary_private = 10.1.1.1
> service = lvs
> backup_active = 1
> backup = 193.144.34.YYY
> backup_private = 10.1.1.2
> heartbeat = 1
> heartbeat_port = 539
> keepalive = 6
> deadtime = 18
> network = nat
> nat_router = 10.1.1.3 eth1:1
> nat_nmask = 255.255.255.240
> debug_level = NONE
> monitor_links = 1
> virtual WEB {
> active = 1
> address = 193.144.34.ZZZ eth0:1
> vip_nmask = 255.255.255.0
> port = 80
> send = "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n"
> expect = "HTTP"
> use_regex = 0
> load_monitor = ruptime
> scheduler = rr
> protocol = tcp
> timeout = 6
> reentry = 15
> quiesce_server = 0
> server proliantA {
> address = 10.1.1.1
> active = 1
> weight = 2000
> }
> server proliantB {
> address = 10.1.1.2
> active = 1
> weight = 1000
> }
> }
>
>
> But the result is, nat not work... because when i active pulse on
> both servers eth0:1 not start propietly and... if any petition to
> 193.144.34.ZZZ may pass to other server this service not work
>
>
> any can help me?
>
>
> Tanks! and sorry my english
>
> ++-------------------------++
> Alejandro Feijóo Fraga
> Tecnico de Sistemas.
> Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
> Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Sur.
> 15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
> Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension: 216
> Fax: 981 59 46 16
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> Piranha-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
++-------------------------++
Alejandro Feijóo Fraga
Tecnico de Sistemas.
Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Sur.
15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension: 216
Fax: 981 59 46 16
More information about the Piranha-list
mailing list