[Pki-devel] [PATCH] 15 Added generics (part 4).
Endi Sukma Dewata
edewata at redhat.com
Mon Feb 13 18:17:32 UTC 2012
John,
I've updated a the patch.
On 2/8/2012 7:26 PM, John Magne wrote:
> 1. Line 346 of patch. Commented out a line instead of removing. Was there perhaps a reason for this?
> //DerOutputStream outChain = new DerOutputStream();
> 2. Line 1467. Commented out line. //String localAgents = req.getParameter("localAgents");
> 3. Line 2313. Commented out line. //String tag = value.substring(0, i);
> 4. Line 2848. Commented out line. //BigInt privateKeyVersion = privateKeyDerIn.getInteger();
>
> I found some instances of commented out lines as above. Those are the ones I was able to find.
These are unused variables. I've revised the patch and remove them
except a few for documentation. For example the following code describes
that the value consists of a tag and a val:
//String tag = value.substring(0, i);
String val = value.substring(i + 1);
The following code is actually needed in order to read the stream
properly so I've restored it:
BigInt privateKeyVersion = privateKeyDerIn.getInteger();
> Also, the following construct I was not sure about. Loading it into Eclipse, there are no flags.
> If you have a couple thoughts on this that would be great.
>
> - protected KeySpec engineGetKeySpec(Key key, Class keySpec)
> + @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
> + protected<T extends KeySpec> T engineGetKeySpec(Key key, Class<T> keySpec)
> throws InvalidKeySpecException {
>
> In this instance it looks like the actual code calling this method has not changed. That could be totally normal.
I was fixing it to match the method signature in the parent class. With
generic method we're supposed to provide the actual type for T (i.e.
DSAPublicKeySpec) when calling the method:
DSAPublicKeySpec dsaPubKeySpec =
this.<DSAPublicKeySpec>engineGetKeySpec(...);
But the compiler can infer the T from the return type and the parameters
so the code can be simplified further:
DSAPublicKeySpec dsaPubKeySpec = engineGetKeySpec(...);
> I noticed that much of the fixes touch the CRL stuff. It would be cool to run a few quick tests consisting of
> revoking some certs and using the agent UI to inspect the CRL's to see if everything looks ok.
Yes, I've done that as part of the smoke test.
Thanks.
--
Endi S. Dewata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dogtag-edewata-0015-1-Added-generics-part-4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 188930 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pki-devel/attachments/20120213/c0b02fbd/attachment.bin>
More information about the Pki-devel
mailing list