[Pki-devel] git push

Adam Young ayoung at redhat.com
Tue Jan 24 02:58:02 UTC 2012


On 01/19/2012 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> I don't think that this is correct.  There is functionality and 
> critical bug fixing going on in the Dogtag 9 branch that we definitely 
> want to get into master.  It needs to get there somehow.  Of course 
> there may be work that is not needed on master due to refactoring, but 
> that needs to be determined on a patch-by-patch basis.
>
> If the concern is changes causing rebase headaches for Endi and Ade, 
> then we could use a gatekeeper approach, but I haven't seen the need 
> for that.
>
> -NGK
You've probably cleared this up, but:  I think that chagnes going on in 
9  are going to need formatting aligned with the Master branch before 
they can be pushed.  Ade had suggested that the approach would involve 
formatting in the 9 series before pushing changes,  but I am not sure if 
this is going to work across the board any way.  I assume that fixes 
going into the 9 series wil lbe small enough patches that they can be 
had merged into  master.




More information about the Pki-devel mailing list