[Pki-devel] git push
Adam Young
ayoung at redhat.com
Tue Jan 24 02:58:02 UTC 2012
On 01/19/2012 04:12 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> I don't think that this is correct. There is functionality and
> critical bug fixing going on in the Dogtag 9 branch that we definitely
> want to get into master. It needs to get there somehow. Of course
> there may be work that is not needed on master due to refactoring, but
> that needs to be determined on a patch-by-patch basis.
>
> If the concern is changes causing rebase headaches for Endi and Ade,
> then we could use a gatekeeper approach, but I haven't seen the need
> for that.
>
> -NGK
You've probably cleared this up, but: I think that chagnes going on in
9 are going to need formatting aligned with the Master branch before
they can be pushed. Ade had suggested that the approach would involve
formatting in the 9 series before pushing changes, but I am not sure if
this is going to work across the board any way. I assume that fixes
going into the 9 series wil lbe small enough patches that they can be
had merged into master.
More information about the Pki-devel
mailing list