[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Red Hat 8 - Instability - AGAIN



On scale of reliability for I would place the OS's in this order:

Win98 :2:Complete sh*t.
WinME :1:DOS is better then WinME.
Win2k Server:8:Solid.
NT4:6.5
WinXP: No XP servers in production.
WinXP Desktop:8.0
Redhat 8.0: 
No 8.0 servers in production yet, still used as test-production machines.
Redhat 8.0 Desktop:8

Redhat 7.3 Desktop: 7.0
Redhat 7.3 Server:8.5 
Close to solid, but hard to determine kernel problems.

This just might be a limitation of me.
I get kernel crashes in Linux and I have problems determining what caused
them.

> --Luke
> --Computer Science Sysadmin, MSU Bozeman 
> --admin(AT)cs.montana.edu 994-3931 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: psyche-list-admin redhat com [mailto:psyche-list-admin redhat com]
> On Behalf Of Craig White
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 7:39 PM
> To: psyche-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: Red Hat 8 - Instability - AGAIN
> 
> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:11, medina campinas unimed com br wrote:
> > Ok.   I apreciate all your advices..   most of all telling me to replace
> > hardware.  I will try to ...    starting changing memory.
> >
> > I have to tell you that I love Linux, but sometimes I lose my temper
> with
> > it.     I have dual boot ( RH and Win98 ) and my Win98 is much more
> stable
> > than RH. They use the same hardware for 3 years (or more), and RH is the
> > only one that hangs !    Strange because it suppose be Win98...   :-)))
> >
> ------
> FWIW - my installation doesn't hang. I think it is far more stable than
> Win98...but then again, Win2K is far more stable than Win98.
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Psyche-list mailing list
> Psyche-list redhat com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]