[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OT Linux in general



On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:13:51PM -0500, Brent Fox wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 13:58, Marek wrote:
> > My point is that this 6 month cycle generally sucks. Can't we get a new 
> > version once a year that is near perfect instead of pushing out 2 
> > versions a year that are never bulletproof ?
> 
> No.  Look at the rate of improvement that the 6 month cycle has
> maintained over the years.  It does not "generally suck."  
> 
> Feel free to upgrade every other release if you want a 12 month release
> cycle.

Or purchase Red Hat Enterprise Linux and you'll get a 12-18 month
release cycle that's specifically targetted towards stable (i.e.
non-bleeding edge) environments.

You can have stable or you can have bleeding-edge.  You can't have both.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts ewilts org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]