[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

About RH9 "usefulness"



On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke (eburke burkecentral net) wrote:
> 
> The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding
> something no one else is doing, all else is out the window. Sorry, but
> the whole NPTL gains nothing...no speed...nothing.No other Linux distro
> is using it or planning on it. That in itself breaks compatibility and
> the products usefulness.
> 
Jesse (or anybody else)

may I ask you to elaborate on this a little more (especially the first
sentence)? Any feedback is welcome.

	Ciao,
		Marco Fioretti
-- 
Marco Fioretti                 m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory         http://www.rule-project.org/en/

Non si vive se non il tempo che si ama.			C. A. Helvetius





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]