[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: About RH9 "usefulness"



On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 04:45, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke (eburke burkecentral net) wrote:
> > 
> > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no
> > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding
> > something no one else is doing, all else is out the window. Sorry, but
> > the whole NPTL gains nothing...no speed...nothing.No other Linux distro
> > is using it or planning on it. That in itself breaks compatibility and
> > the products usefulness.

how about "it provides Posix compliant, non-broken threading" for the
first time in linux history

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]